• Home
  • About Us
    • Brief Introduction
    • Address from the Director
    • Directors
    • Organization
    • IUE in Media
  • Scientists
    • Academicians
    • Professors
    • Associate Professors
  • Research
    • Research Divisions
    • Research Progress
  • Education
    • Admission
    • Study at IUE
    • Scholarships
  • INT'L Cooperation
    • INT'L Cooperation News
    • Partnership
  • Papers
  • Join Us
    • Job Opportunities
    • PIFI
      • What's PIFI
Contact Us   |   Sitemap   |   CAS   |   中文
Contact Us   |   Sitemap   |   CAS   |   中文
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Brief Introduction
    • Address from the Director
    • Directors
    • Organization
    • IUE in Media
  • Scientists
    • Academicians
    • Professors
    • Associate Professors
  • Research
    • Research Divisions
    • Research Progress
  • Education
    • Admission
    • Study at IUE
    • Scholarships
  • INT'L Cooperation
    • INT'L Cooperation News
    • Partnership
  • Papers
  • Join Us
    • Job Opportunities
    • PIFI

Papers

  • HomePapers
  • Papers
    Digital Optical Method to Quantify the Visual Opacity of Fugitive Plumes
    Ke Du*, Peng Shi, Mark J. Rood, Kai Wang, Yang Wang and Ravi Varma
    Fugitive emissions of particulate matter (PM) raise public concerns due to their adverse impacts on human health and atmospheric visibility. Although the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has not developed a standard method for quantifying the opacities of fugitive plumes, select states have developed human vision-based opacity methods for such applications. A digital photographic method, Digital Optical Method for fugitive plumes (DOMfugitive), is described herein for quantifying the opacities of fugitive plume emissions. Field campaigns were completed to evaluate this method by driving vehicles on unpaved roads to generate dust plumes. DOMfugitive was validated by performing simultaneous measurements using a co-located laser transmissometer. For 84% of the measurements, the individual absolute opacity difference values between the two methods were ≤15%. The average absolute opacity difference for all the measurements was 8.5%. The paired t-test showed no significant difference between the two methods at 99% confidence level. Comparisons of wavelength dependent opacities with grayscale opacities indicated that DOMfugitive was not sensitive to the wavelength in the visible spectrum evaluated during these field campaigns. These results encourage the development of a USEPA standard method for quantifying the opacities of fugitive PM plumes using digital photography, as an alternative to human-vision based approaches.

    Key words:digital photography; Method 9; fugitive emission; laser transmissometer

    Volume:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.017

    Page:

    Journal:Atmospheric Enviornment

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.017

    About Us

    • Brief Introduction
    • Address from the Director
    • Directors
    • Organization
    • IUE in Media

    Scientists

    • Academicians
    • Professors
    • Associate Professors

    Research

    • Research Divisions
    • Research Progress

    Education

    • Admission
    • Study at IUE
    • Scholarships

    INT'L Cooperation

    • INT'L Cooperation News
    • Partnership

    Papers

    Join Us

    • Job Opportunities
    • PIFI
    Copyright © Institute of Urban Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences. All Rights Reserved.
    1799 Jimei Road, Xiamen 361021 China.+86-592-6190973.